TAX REVENUE AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY: SEASONALITY, COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Rudi Handoko Badan Kebijakan Fiskal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v3i1.401

Keywords:

tax revenue, economic activity, seasonality, cointegration, causality, Indonesia

Abstract

The role of taxation is very important for the financing of development in Indonesia. However, the performance of tax revenue has not been optimally indicated by the low ratio of tax to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which in 2015 the ratio is 10.7% of GDP. This tax ratio is still lower than the tax ratio of neighboring countries such as the Philippines (13.6%), Malaysia (14.3%) and Thailand (16.5%). Even in 2016 the tax ratio declined slightly to 10.3% of GDP.

With the scope of the study limited to non-oil and gas income tax and value added tax which contributes more than 80 percent of total tax revenue, this study objective is to understand the relationship between tax revenue and economic activity that can provide insight into the effectiveness of tax policy.

This study uses monthly realization of tax revenue both total and sectoral. For economic activity data, we use data derived from national account data or GDP based on expenditure and production approach (sectoral). Monthly tax revenue data is then aggregated into quarterly data to match the frequency of GDP data. Period of data being studied is Q1 2010 - Q4 2017. Tax revenue and economic activity data needs to be seasonal adjusted and then separated into trends and cycles. To examine the relationship between tax revenue and economic activity, we performed several tests such as unit root test, cointegration test and causality test.

The main contribution of this study are the empirical testing on the lingkage between tax revenue collection and economic activity and the policy implication of this study which in order to increase the tax revenue collection, government should formulate policy to increase production, investment and consumption because production, investment and consumption will increase tax base.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2015. Tabel Input Output Indonesia 2010. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Barsky, R., and J. Miron. 1989. “The Seasonal Cycle and the Business Cycle.†Journal of Political Economy 97 (3): 503–4. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830453.

Brooks, Chris. 2014. Introductory Econometrics for Finance. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chigbu, E.E, L.E Akujuobi, and E Appah. 2012. “‘An Empirical Study on the Causality between Economic Growth and Taxation in Nigeria.’†Current Research Journal of Economic Theory 4 (2): 29–38.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. 2013. Undang-Undang PPh Dan Peraturan Pelaksanaannya. www.pajak.go.id/sites/.../UU-PPh-001-13-UU PPh 2013-00 Mobile.pdf.

Enders, W. 2015. Applied Econometrics Time Series. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Engle, R. F., and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.†Econometrica 55 (2): 251–76.

Harris, R., and R. Sollis. 2003. Applied Time Series Modelling and Forecasting. England: John Wiley and Sons.

Hidayat, T. 2016. “Analisa PDB Indonesia 2012-2015.†2016. http://www.tony-hidayat.com/2016/10/analisa-pdb-indonesia-2012-2015.html.

Iriqat, Raed A. M., and Ahmad N. H. Anabtawi. 2016. “GDP and Tax Revenues-Causality Relationship in Developing Countries: Evidence from Palestine.†International Journal of Economics and Finance 8 (4): 54. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n4p54.

Kementerian Keuangan. 2009. Persandingan Susunan Dalam Satu Naskah Undang-Undang Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Dan Pajak Penjualan Atas Barang Mewah 2009. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/sites/default/files/persandinganuuppn.pdf.

Lescaroux, F., and V. Mignon. 2008. “On the Influence of Oil Prices on Economic Activity and Other Macroeconomic and Financial Variables.†OPEC Energy Review 32 (4): 343–80.

Mankiw, N.G. 2011. Principles of Economics. 5th ed. New York: South-Western Cengage Learning.

———. 2016. Macroeconomics. 9th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.

Poesoro, A. 2015. “Narrowing Tax Gap: Cross Countries Experience.†DDTC Working Paper.

Saqib, S., T. Ali, M.F. Riaz, S. Anwar, and A. Aslam. 2014. “Taxation Effects on Economic Activity in Pakistan.†Journal of Finane and Economics 2 (6): 215–19. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfe-2-6-3.

Takumah, Wisdom. 2014. “Cointegration and Causality Between Tax Revenue and Economic Growth in Ghana.†International Research Journal of Marketing and Economics 1 (November): 30–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268317314_COINTEGRATION_AND_CAUSALITY_BETWEEN_TAX_REVENUE_AND_ECONOMIC_GROWTH_IN_GHANA.

Tanzi, V. 1988. “The Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on the Level of Taxation (and on the Fiscal Balance) in Developing Countries.†WP/88/95.

Uppal, J.S. 2003. Tax Reform in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah University Press.

Widarjono, A. 2017. Ekonometrika: Pengantar Dan Aplikasinya Disertai Panduan EViews. Edisi ke-4. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Wooldridge, J. M. 2016. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 6th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Zakaria, Z., and M. Nabi. 2016. “Empirical Evidence Based on Malaysia Data.†Advanced Science Letters 22 (5–6): 1384–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.6618.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles