Individual Taxpayers Compliance and Strategy For Improvements

Authors

  • Rita Helbra Tenrini Pusat Kebijakan APBN, Badan Kebijakan Fiskal, Kementerian Keuangan
  • Anda Nugroho Pusat Kebijakan APBN, Badan Kebijakan Fiskal, Kementerian Keuangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v18i2.47

Keywords:

extensification, individual taxpayers, tax compliance, tax potential

Abstract

Everyone who has income above nontaxable threshold are required to register as a taxpayer. Indonesia has low rate o f registered taxpayer, only around 18 percent. This makes the tax revenue also low as the tax ratio is only 11 to 12 percent in the recent years. This figure is lower than its neighboring countries which has tax ratios above 14 percent Lower tax revenue makes it harder to finance public spending for the government, moreover, it could lead to budget deficits. This study analyzes the factors that influence the compliance o f taxpayer registration. The method used was descriptive quantitative approach. Micro data processing is conducted on National taxpayers database and household survey. The result shows that the characteristic o f taxpayers compliance determined by various factors such as business, industrial, sociological and regional. The extensification policy for taxpayers should be more focused on (i) individual taxpayers from non employee (individual entrepreneur); (ii) mining and construction sector; (iii) taxpayers with the age o f 41 years and above; (iv) provinces with low compliance, which are Gorontalo, Papua, West Nusa Tenggara, North Maluku and East Nusa Tenggara. The extensification must consider the potential tax payers o f each region and also human resource needs.

References

Brotodihardjo S. (1995). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak. Edisi ktiga. Bandung: PT. Eresco.

Brown L. dan A. Harding. (2002). Social Modelling and Public Policy: What is Microsimulation Modelling and How is it Being Used? Conference Paper cp2002_007. Sydney : University of Technology Sydney.

Brown R.E. and Mazur M.J (2003). IRS's Comprehensive Approach to Compliance Measurement Washington DC : Internal Revenue Service.

CreedyJ. (2001). Tax Modelling. The Economic Record, vol. 77 issue 237, pages 189-202.

Devos K. (2005). The Attitudes of Tertiary Students on Tax Evasion and The Penalties for Tax Evasion- A Pilot Study and Demographic Analysis, ejournal of Tax Research Vol 3 no.2. pp.222-273. The University of New South Wales : Atax.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2012). Laporan Tahunan 2011 DJP.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2012). Laporan Tahunan 2012 DJP.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. KEP-34/PJ./2003 Tentang Klasifikasi Lapangan Usaha WP.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. KEP-321/PJ/2012 Tentang Perubahan Atas Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor Kep-233/PJ/2012 Tentang Klasifikasi Lapangan Usaha WP.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. KEP-161/PJ./2001 Tentang Jangka Waktu Pendaftaran Dan Pelaporan Kegiatan Usaha, Tata Cara Pendaftaran Dan Penghapusan Nomor Pokok WP, Serta Pengukuhan Dan Pencabutan Pengukuhan Pengusaha Kena Pajak.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. PER-44/PJ/2008 Tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Nomor Pokok WP Dan/Atau Pengukuhan Pengusaha Kena Pajak, Perubahan Data Dan Pemindahan WP Dan/Atau Pengusaha Kena Pajak.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. PER-32/PJ/2010 Tentang Pelaksanaan Pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 25 Bagi WP OP Pengusaha Tertentu

Djati H.P. (2004). Pengaruh Pertambahan Jumlah dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak. Jakarta : Universitas Indonesia.

Firnandy. (2004). Profil Pekerja di Sektor Informal dan Arah Kebijakan ke Depan, Info Kajian Bappenas Vol. 1 No. 3 Desember 2004.

Hasseidine J. (1993). How Do Revenue Audits Affect Taxpayer Compliance? Bulletin for International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, vol. 47 No.7/8, 424.

International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation. (1992). International Tax Glossary. Amsterdam : IBFD Publications.

James S. Clinton A. (2004). Tax Compliance, Self-Assessment and Tax Administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services. Vol.2 No.2.

Jinjing L.(2011). Dynamic Microsimulation for Public Policy Analysis. Dissertation at Maastricht University. Boekenplan, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Kementerian Keuangan. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No.l49/PMK.03/2011 tentang Sensus Pajak Nasional.

Lavinia M., Holly S. dan Melvyn W. (2000). Microsimulation Modelling for Policy Analysis, Challenges and Innovations. United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press

Lewis A. (1983). Psychology of Taxation. The Economic Journal Vo.93 No.372. p 942-944. Royal Economic Society.

Mansury, R. (1996). Pajak Penghasilan Lanjutan, Jakarta : Ind-Hill Co.

Morris T. and M. Lonsdale. (2005). Translating The Compliance Model Into Practical Reality. Proceedings of the 2004 Internal Revenue Service Research Conference, Washington, DC. Treasury Department, Washington, DC.

Okello A. (2014). Managing Income Tax Compliance Through Self-Assessment. IMF Working Paper WP/14/41.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Forum Tax Administration: Compliance Sub-Group. Information Note. Managing and Improving Compliance: Recent Developments in Compliance Risk Treatments. Centre For Tax Policy And Administration.

Sensus Pajak Digiatkan Lagi. (2013). Kompas. 11 Feb 2013. Diakses 26 September 2013, dari http://bisniskeuangan.kompas.com/read/2013/02/ll /02171978/Sensus.Paiak.Digiatkan. Lagi.

Shinaga S. (2005). Pengangguran Kok Dapat NPWP. DetikNews. 12 Okt 2005. Diakses pada 13 Sept 2013, dari http://news.detik.com/read/2005/10/12/090009/459714/10/pengangguran kok-dapat- npwp?nd771104bcj.

Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas UU No.6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan

Downloads

Published

2015-11-09

Issue

Section

Articles