Probability of Default Bank Umum di Indonesia: Alternatif dalam Implementasi Sisitem Premi Deferensial

Authors

  • Nugroho Agung Wijoyo Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v5i1.531

Keywords:

Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan, sistem premi flat rate, Sistem Premi Diferensial, Probabilits Default.

Abstract

The Indonesian Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS) initially imposed the flat rate premium system, the same premium rate for all banks, which is 0.2% of the total third party funds (DPK) of commercial banks. However; when there is a change in the value of deposits guaranteed, LPS needs to change from the flat rate premium system to the Differential Premium System. This study uses Probability of Default (PoD), derived from the Merton Model (1974), for each individual Commercial Bank in Indonesia in implementing the Differential Premium System as the mandate of Article 15 paragraph (1) of the Law. Thus, each individual bank will pay a premium in accordance with the probability of default to LPS. This study finds that the average of probability of default of all commercial banks in the period 2002-2014 reaches 57.12%. Bank that has the smallest average Probability of Default (PoD) is Bank 151  with a PoD of 14.10% and an AA category rating. The second position is Bank 427 with a PoD of 18.20% and a rating of A. While the third position is Bank 14 with a PoD of 18.70% also with a rating of A. This study finds that the Differential Premium System in Indonesia can be implemented, given that LPS revenue will not be reduced much or at least close to the flat rate premium system, when LPS imposes the Differential Premium System.

References

Ayomi, S. H. (2013). Systemic Risk and Financial Linkages Measurement in The Indonesian Banking. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking (Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan), Vol. 16, No.2, 91-114.

Bartram, S. M. (2007). Estimating Systemic Risk in The International Financial System. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 835-869.

Black, F. S. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654.

Cooperstein, R. L., Pennachi, G. G., & Redburn, F. S. (1995). The Aggregate Cost of Deposit Insurance: A Multiperiod Analysis. Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol 4, pp. 242-271.

International Association of Deposit Insurers. 2011. General Guidance for Developing Differential Premium Systems.

Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 26 Tahun 1998 tentang Jaminan terhadap Kewajiban Pembayaran Bank Umum.

Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 193 Tahun 1998 tentang Jaminan Tanggung Jawab Pembayaran Bank Perkreditan Rakyat.

Marcus, A. S. (1984). The Valuation of FDIC Deposit Insurance using Option-Pricing Estimates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, No. 16.

Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of Rational Option Pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science , 141-183.

Merton, R. C. (1974). On The Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Finance, Vol. 29 No. 2.

Merton, R. C. (1977). An Analytic Derivation of The Cost of Deposit Insurance and Loan Guarantees. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1.

Ronn, E. V. (1986). Pricing Risk-Adjusted Deposit Insurance: An Option-based Model. Journal of Finance, 41.

Saldías, M. (2013). Systemic Risk Analysis using Forward-Looking Distance-to-Default Series. Journal of Financial Stability, 9(4), 498-517.

Segoviano, M., & Goodhart, C. (2009). Banking Stability Measures. IMF Working Paper.

Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 tentang Lembaga Penjaminan Simpanan.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-12

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY AND COPYRIGHT RELEASE

I hereby certify that:

  1. The article (Article title) is authentic and never being published previously or will be published in other publication as well as not a plagiarism in any form.
  1. The article does not have any issue with other parties, regarding of the publication copyright.
  1. All the authors have read this statement and agree with the name and sequence.
  1. Hereby, I transfer the copyright of my article (Article title) to the KEK Editorial Board . this copyright transfer includes a right to reproduce a photograph for the similar article and its translation. This is also including a right to upload the article into a computer system which disseminated widely on the internet.
  1. Hereby, I agree with my article (Article title) to be published by KEK Volume (xx) Edition (x), under Creative Common Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 licensing. This is also including a right to upload the article into a computer system which disseminated widely on the internet.

Name : (Full Name)
Date : (Signing date)