Transformasi Hijau dan Implikasinya terhadap Daya Saing Berkelanjutan

Authors

  • Pihri Buhaerah Pusat Penelitian Ekonomi LIPI
  • Kanetasya Sabilla Pusat Penelitian Ekonomi LIPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v5i1.787

Abstract

Transformasi Hijau dan Implikasinya terhadap Daya Saing Berkelanjutan

Abstract

This paper examines the linkage of green transformation and competitive advantage at the global level using constant market share and global value chain analysis. Constant market share analysis is used to measure a country’s trade contribution by comparing a country’s export growth with world export growth. Global value chain analysis is also employed to strengthen the constant market share analysis by looking at the role of green transformation in boosting the Indonesian competitiveness in the global supply chain. To achieve the objective of this study, data was collected from secondary sources such as the United Nations Comtrade Database and Asian Development Bank multi-regional input-output (ADB MRIO) for the period of 2000-2018. Constant market share analysis shows that dirty manufactured products from Indonesia can no longer be relied on to compete in the US and European markets due to the increasingly stringent environmental standards and regulations in those countries. Meanwhile, global value chain analysis finds that the clean manufacturing industry has higher competitiveness than the gross manufacturing industry at the global market level. For this reason, this study concludes that the future of Indonesia's manufacturing industry to compete at the global level is in the hand of the clean manufacturing industry.

Keywords: green transformation; competitiveness; environmental regulation;  constant market share analysis;  global value chain analysis

JEL Classification: F14, F18, Q56

References

Al-Ayouty, I., Hassaballa, H., & Rizk, R. (2017). Clean manufacturing industries and environmental quality: The case of Egypt.

Environmental Development, 21(May), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2016.11.005

Aisbett, E., & Pearson, L. M. (2012). Environmental and Health Protections, or new Protectionism? Determinants of SPS Notifications by WTO Members (No. 12–13).

Altenburg, T., & Pegels, A. (2012). Sustainability-oriented innovation systems – managing the green transformation. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 5–22.

Cabral, S. (2004). Recent Evolution of the Portuguese Export Market Shares in the European Union. Economic Bulletin, (December), 79–91.

Cheng, M., Shao, Z., Yang, C., & Tang, X. (2019). Analysis of Coordinated Development of Energy and Environment in China’s Manufacturing Industry under Environmental Regulation: A Comparative Study of Sub-Industries. Sustainability, 11(6510), 1–20.

Cohen, M. A., & Tubb, A. (2018). The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm and Country Competitiveness : A Meta-analysis of the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 5(2), 371–399.

Dechezlepretre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013

Fontoura, M. P., & Serôdio, P. (2017). The Export Performance of the 2004 EU Enlargement Economies since the 1990s: a Constant Market Share Analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 23(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-017-9630-3

Ghodsi, M., Grübler, J., Reiter, O., & Stehrer, R. (2017). The Evolution of Non-Tariff Measures and their Diverse Effects on Trade. Vienna.

Gu, S., Xie, M., & Zhang, X. (2015). Green Transformation and Development. Hainan: Zhejiang University Press.

Hou, J., Teo, T. S. H., Zhou, F., Lim, M. K., & Chen, H. (2020). Does industrial green transformation successfully facilitate a decrease in carbon intensity in China? An environmental regulation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184(December 2009), 1060–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.311

Kaiser, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2003). International Competition and Environmental Expenditures: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Plants (No. 222). Hamburg.

Karaduman, H. A., & Gonel, F. (2016). Dirty industries’ competitiveness in EU’s new members. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 13(3), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjstsd-02-2016-0016

Koziuk, V., Economic, T. N., Hayda, Y., Economic, T. N., Dluhopolskyi, O., Economic, T. N., & Klapkiv, Y. (2019). STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS : 12(4). https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17

Li, H., Zhu, X., Chen, J., & Jiang, F. (2019). Environmental regulations, environmental governance efficiency and the green transformation of China’s iron and steel enterprises. Ecological Economics, 165(July), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106397

Liu, J., & Xie, J. (2020). Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Export Competitiveness: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1427.

Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960 to 1995. The Journal of Environment & Development, 7, 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659800700302

Melo, J. De, & Solleder, J. (2020). Barriers to trade in environmental goods : How important they are and what should developing countries expect from their removal. World Development, 130, 104910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104910

Milana, C. (1988). Constant-market-shares analysis and index number theory. European Journal of Political Economy, 4(4), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(88)90011-0

Mulatu, A., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Withagen, C. A. A. M. (2001). Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis of International Trade Studies.

Murina, M., & Nicita, A. (2015). Trading with Conditions: The Effect of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on the Agricultural Exports from Low-income Countries. The World Economy, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12368

Niu, Z., Liu, C., Gunessee, S., & Milner, C. (2018). Non-tariff and overall protection: evidence across countries and over time. Review of World Economics, 154, 675–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-018-0317-5

Pandiella, A. (2015). OECD Economics Department Working Papers No . 1186 A Constant Market Share Analysis of Spanish Goods Exports.

Parto, S., & Herbert-Copley, B. (2007). Industrial innovation and environmental regulation: Developing workable solutions. Tokyo: Unted Nations University.

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014

Skrinner, E. (2009). Competitiveness and specialisation of the Austrian export sector: A constant-market-shares analysis Reihe Ökonomie / Economics Series No.235, Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Vienna

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). Non-Tariff Measures: Economic Assessment and Policy Options for Development. Geneva.

World Bank. (2020a). Economy Profile Indonesia: Doing Business 2020.

World Bank. (2020b). Indonesia Economic Prospects: The Long Road to Recovery (July 2020). Jakarta.

Published

2021-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles